Ensuring optimal treatment outcomes while minimizing adverse reactions has always been a central challenge in medical aesthetics. Traditional high-fluence laser protocols are effective but frequently associated with complications such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) and barrier disruption—especially in melanin-rich Asian skin types.
Low-Fluence, High-Spot-Size (LFHSS) laser technology offers a safer alternative by combining gentle thermal effects mit precise pigment targeting. Today, this technique is widely applied in 1064 nm / 755 nm, Nanosekunde Und Pikosekunde Plattformen.
This article provides a comprehensive scientific and clinical overview of LFHSS: its origin, standardized definition, indication-specific parameters, treatment precautions, and contraindications—offering physicians a structured and evidence-based protocol.
1. Origin and Standard Definition
1.1 Historical Background
LFHSS can be traced back to the mid-2000s, when Korean dermatologists first applied large spot sizes and low fluence mit Q-switched Nd:YAG 1064 nm nanosecond lasers for melasma management—coining the term Laser Toning.
The approach quickly gained global popularity and later inspired technologies such as “Whitening Toning,” “Carbon Peeling,” and other low-fluence programs.
With device evolution, LFHSS expanded to 755 nm nanosecond and picosecond lasers, enabling more precise pigment-selective treatment and significantly reduced risk of complications.
1.2 Standard Definition of LFHSS
LFHSS must meet all of the following technical criteria:
| Parameter | Standard Requirement |
|---|---|
| Spotgröße | ≥ 6 mm |
| Fluence | ≤ 3 J/cm² |
| Treatment Endpoint | Mild warming or slight erythema |
Wavelength Characteristics
- 1064 nm → deeper penetration; targets dermal pigment (melasma, Hori’s nevus, PIH)
- 755 nm → higher melanin absorption; ideal for epidermal pigment (freckles, epidermal melasma)
Pulsdauer
- Picosecond → photomechanical pigment fragmentation + skin rejuvenation
- Nanosecond → epidermal/dermal modulation and skin conditioning
2.1 Pigmentary Disorders
(1) Melasma – 1064 nm Nanosecond Laser as Standard of Care
Recommended Parameters
- Spot size: 6–8 mm
- Fluence: 1–3 J/cm²
- Frequenz: 5–10 Hz
- Interval: every 2–4 weeks
- Total sessions: ≤ 15 sessions
(Exceeding 15 sessions increases risk of mottled hypopigmentation.)
Mechanismus:
LFHSS applies “subcellular selective photothermolysis”—breaking melanosomes while preserving melanocyte viability, thereby reducing PIH and rebound pigmentation.
(2) Hori’s Nevus / Dermal Melanocytosis
First choice:
755 nm picosecond laser
→ stronger photomechanical fragmentation
→ lower risk of PIH
If using a 1064 nm nanosecond device:
- Spot size: 6–8 mm
- Fluence: 1–3 J/cm²
- Frequenz: 5–10 Hz
- Interval: 2–4 Wochen
2.2 Inflammatory & Degenerative Skin Conditions
(1) Rosacea & Steroid-Induced Dermatitis
Recommended (1064 nm nanosecond “toning mode”)
- Spot size: 6–8 mm
- Fluence: 0.3–1.5 J/cm²
- Interval: 4 Wochen
Mechanismen:
- Modulates vascular reactivity
- Reduces inflammatory cytokines
- Accelerates barrier repair
- Improves flushing and sensitivity
(2) Skin Rejuvenation (755 nm Picosecond + MLA Technology)
Recommended Parameters
- Spot size: 6–8 mm
- Fluence: 0.5–1.0 J/cm²
- Frequenz: 5–10 Hz
- Interval: every 4 weeks
Vorteile:
- Collagen neogenesis
- Textur und Porenverfeinerung
- Fine lines reduction
- Minimale Ausfallzeit
3. Treatment Precautions
3.1 Patch Test Protocol (Mandatory Step)
- Start with 1 J/cm², deliver 1–2 shots, observe for 5 minutes
- If purplish erythema or pain → decrease fluence by 0.2–0.5 J/cm²
- If minimal reaction → increase by 0.2–0.5 J/cm² (not exceeding 3 J/cm²)
- During full-face treatment, ensure the skin temperature stays below 40°C after 2–3 passes.
3.2 Preventing Excess Energy Accumulation
- Overlap rate: ≤ 10%
- Melasma: do not exceed 15 lifetime sessions
- Periokular & perioral areas: reduce fluence by 20 %
- Always enable device cooling
(air cooling / contact cooling / cryogen depending on device)
4. Contraindications
4.1 High-Vascular-Density Lesions (Port-Wine Stain, Hemangioma)
1064/755 nm wavelengths have low hemoglobin absorption →
LFHSS fluence is insufficient to coagulate vessels →
May worsen vascular proliferation → Contraindicated
4.2 High-Density Tattoo Pigment
LFHSS fluence cannot reach the “instantaneous pigment explosion threshold” needed for tattoo removal.
- Leads to inadequate fragmentation
- Requires excessive sessions
- Increases inflammation and PIH
→ Use high-fluence Q-switched or picosecond protocols instead.
4.3 Hyperkeratotic Lesions (Seborrheic Keratosis, Warts)
LFHSS is nichtablativ and relies mainly on photobiomodulation →
Cannot vaporize keratin →
May stimulate further hyperkeratosis → Contraindicated
Abschluss
LFHSS technology, based on large spot size and low fluence, provides a safer, gentler laser strategy across multiple wavelengths and pulse modes. It offers significant benefits in:
- Pigmentary disorders
- Inflammatory skin conditions
- Hautverjüngung
- Sensitive-skin management
However, clinicians should note:
- Clear clinical consensus currently exists only for melasma
- 15 sessions increases risk of mottled hypopigmentation
- Evidence for rosacea and rejuvenation requires more long-term RCTs
- Contraindications must be strictly followed
Future studies—especially multicenter randomized controlled trials—are essential to further define LFHSS treatment boundaries, optimize parameters, and elevate safety standards across medical aesthetic practice.
Weitere verwandte Blogs
Warum der fraktionierte CO₂-Laser bei der Heilung von Tätowierungen hilft
Was sind Q-Switch- und YAG-Laser für professionelle Hautpflege?
Wie effektiv ist der Q-Switched ND: YAG-Laser zur Behandlung von Melasma?
Pico-Laser vs. CO₂-Laser – Was ist besser für die Tattooentfernung?
Q-santer Laser: Mechanismus, Indikationen, Kontraindikationen, Parameter & Vorsichtsmaßnahmen
Q-Switch Laser Recovery-Zeit: Was zu erwarten ist und wie Sie die Heilung beschleunigen können
Betrieb einer tragbaren Picoway-Pikosekundenmaschine
Was ist die beste Lasermaschine für die professionelle Tattoo -Entfernung im Jahr 2025?
